Article 142.1. Falsification of voting results

Inclusion of unrecorded ballots in the number of ballots used in the voting or provision of known incorrect information on voters, voters, participants in the referendum, participants in the Russian general goal Lists of voters, voters, participants in the referendum and participants in the general Russian vote, by including persons who do not have an active vote, are clearly incorrect. the right to participate in a referendum, a general Russian vote, or fictional persons, or the falsification of signatures of voters, participants in a referendum, participants in a general Russian vote I am on the voters ' lists, participants in the referendum, participants in the general Russian ballot, or the replacement of valid ballot papers with voters ' marks, participants in the referendum, participants in the general Russian ballot. or the breakdown of ballot papers resulting in the inability to determine the will of voters, voters, participants in the referendum, participants in the general Russian ballot or the unlawful destruction of the ballot box By the summer, or by the deliberate miscalculation of the votes of voters, participants in the referendum, participants in the general Russian ballot, or by the signing of the referendum commission by the members of the electoral commission or the referendum commission. the result of the vote before the vote is counted or the result of the vote is determined, or the record of the result (not in accordance with the valid result of the vote) is clearly incorrect Impositions or unlawful changes in the record of the result of the vote after the vote has been completed, or known misconstruement of the result of the vote, determination of the results of the election, referee Thinking of a Russian-wide vote — punishable by a fine of between 200,000 and 500,000 rubles, or in the amount of the convicted person ' s salary or other income for a period of one to three years The Committee notes that the State party’s observations on the admissibility and merits of the communication are consistent with the Committee’s jurisprudence that the State party’s observations on the admissibility and merits of the communication are consistent with the Committee’s jurisprudence.