Article 26.4.

1. In cases where special knowledge in science, technology, art or craft is required in an administrative offence case, the judge, body shall: The other person in charge of the case shall make a determination on the appointment of the expert; the determination shall be binding on the experts or institutions entrusted with the conduct of the expert. 2. The definition shall state: (1) the reasons for the appointment of the expert; (2) the name, first name, patronymic of the expert or the institution in which the examination is to be carried out; (3) the questions, para. 4. A list of the materials made available to the expert and a description of the expert ' s rights and obligations and of the pre-trial investigation should also be included in the definition. 3. The questions put to the expert and his opinion cannot go beyond the expert ' s special knowledge. 4. Before issuing a decision for execution, the judge, the authority, the official in charge of the administrative offence shall inform the person in respect of the offence. Administrative and victim proceedings are under way to explain rights, including the right to challenge an expert, the right to request an expert 5. The expert shall give a written opinion on his/her behalf. The holder, or electronically, including in the form of an electronic document signed by an enhanced qualified expert under the legislation of the Russian Federation. The expert ' s training should indicate by whom and on what basis the studies were conducted, their content, informed answers to the questions put to the expert, and conclusions drawn. 6. The expert ' s opinion is not binding on the judge, the authority, the official in charge of the administrative offence, but disagrees with the expert ' s opinion. You must be motivated.