Article 28.1. Promulgation of an administrative offence

1. The grounds for initiating administrative proceedings are: (1) direct detection by officials authorized to draw up records of administrative offences :: sufficient data to indicate the existence of an administrative offence; (2) available from law enforcement agencies, as well as from other State bodies, local authorities themselves Information on the existence of an administrative offence; (3) communications and statements of natural and legal persons; and Communications in the media containing data indicating the existence of an administrative offence (except for administrative offences provided for in article 2, paragraph 2, of the Convention) 5.27 Article 14.52 of the present Code); 4) recording of an administrative offence in the field of environmental protection and management (with regard to administrative offences provided for in the Code); Article 8.2 of the present Code, in the field of traffic or an administrative offence in the area of improvement of territory, an administrative offence or the non-payment of vehicle charges on toll-free public roads of regional, inter-municipal and local importance, private motor vehicles Provision is made for public roads, public roads of regional, inter-municipal and local importance, private public roads by the law of the constituent entity of the Russian Federation committed with the use of a means of transport or by the owner or other owner of the land or other real property Automatically by special technical means with the functions of photography, film, video or photographic, film, video and administrative law Violations under article 14.3.1, part 6.7, part 4.5, part 4.6, part 4 of article 14.43, part 4 of article 15.12.2 of the present Code, using an information monitoring system; (5) c/ Approval of the information contained in the message or statement of the owner (owner) of the vehicle that, in the cases provided for in paragraph 4 of this Part, the vehicle was 1.1 The grounds for bringing proceedings for administrative offences under articles 14.12, 14.13 and 14.23 of the present Code are: as set out in paragraphs 1.2 and 3 of part 1 of this article, as well as applications by persons involved in bankruptcy proceedings and persons involved in bankruptcy arbitration, the administration of the debtor — juri 1.2 The basis for the initiation of proceedings against an arbitral tribunal that contains sufficient evidence to indicate the existence of an administrative offence. The administrative offences provided for in articles 14.9, 14.31, 14.32, 14.33, 14.40 of the present Code are the decisions of the competition authority commission which found violations of the law. 1.2-1. The reason for bringing cases of administrative offences under articles 14.9.1 of the present Code is the adoption of the Code by the Commissions. By being an anti-monopoly body, which has established that the procedure for the implementation of the decision by a federal executive body or a State authority of the constituent entity of the Russian Federation has been violated; by the local authority or other acting body or organization, organization involved in the provision of public or municipal services, 1.2-2 The reason for bringing proceedings for administrative offences under article 7.30.3 of the present Code is the adoption of a comis. by this federal executive body responsible for State control (oversight) in the area of State defence orders, decisions finding violations 1.2-3. Reasons for initiating proceedings concerning administrative offences provided for in article 7.30.3, paragraphs 3 and 15. is the failure, within the prescribed time frame, to comply with the requirement of the federal executive body responsible for State control (oversight) in the sphere of public administration. 1.3 The reason for bringing administrative proceedings is that the State defence order has been violated. 8.35 and 8.37 of the present Code is an act on the existence of evidence of an administrative offence or an offence connected with a violation of Ros law. 2. This is the beginning of the hunt and conservation of hunting resources, which has been drawn up by the industrial hunting inspector in accordance with the legislation of the Russian Federation. 1 and 1.1 of the present article, material, communications and applications are subject to review by officials authorized to draw up records of administrative offences. An offence may only be initiated by an official authorized to draw up a record of an administrative offence if there is at least one of the grounds provided for in part. 3.1 The Hell case Ministerial offence of non-compliance with mandatory requirements subject to State control (oversight), municipal control, with cash and one of the grounds provided for in paragraph 1 to 3 of part 1 of this article for the institution of proceedings may be initiated only after a supervisory (oversight) activity has been carried out in cooperation with the State party. a person subject to surveillance, inspection, monitoring (oversight) under constant State control (oversight), constant raid and presentation of its results, except in the event of an incident 3.2 An administrative offence may be brought before the results of the control procedure are filed. (e) Activities, inspections, monitoring (oversight) activities within the framework of permanent State control (oversight), continuous raid if necessary for the application of security measures; In the case of administrative offences referred to in articles 27.10, 27.14 and 27.16 of the present Code, all cases of administrative offences initiated prior to the issuance of the result :: Control (oversight) activity, inspection, monitoring (oversight) activity under constant State control (oversight), continuous raid by a duct official 3.3. Cases of administrative offences shall be notified to the Public Prosecutor within 24 hours. 9.21 of the present Code may be initiated by a federal competition authority or its territorial authority without monitoring (oversight) in the case of a mother The reports submitted to the Federal Anti-Monopoly Authority and its territorial authority contain sufficient data to indicate the existence of an administrative offence 3.4 Cases of administrative offences under article 9.1, paragraph 1, of the present Code may be brought without monitoring (oversight) in the event of failure to submit To the executive body responsible for the federal State supervision in the field of industrial safety, information on the organization of the industrial control of compliance with the requirements of 3.5 Without monitoring (oversight) activities in conjunction with the person under control, the body responsible for monitoring and supervising communications, informatio In the event of the entry into force of the law of the Republic of Moldova, the State party may institute proceedings for administrative offences under article 13.11, paragraphs 1 to 2, 4, 10 to 18, of the Code of Criminal Procedure, in the event of the entry into force of the Code of Criminal Procedure. of the person who has committed an administrative offence, evidence of the existence of an administrative offence), article 13.11.3, paragraphs 1.2 and 4 (in the event of the entry from the legal profession) on the perpetrator of an administrative offence, evidence of the existence of an administrative offence), article 13.21, paragraph 1 (in the case of a mass informant) and who has committed an administrative offence, evidence of the production or distribution of the media, the record of which has not been changed, acquiescing changes in the founders, changes in the composition of co-sponsors of this Code, and in the cases provided for in article 6.13 (on administrative offences committed by the mass media) 6.21 (in respect of administrative offences committed by the media), article 6.21.1 (in respect of administrative offences committed by the media), article 6.21.1 (in respect of administrative offences 2 of article 6.21.2 (in respect of administrative offences committed by the media), articles 13.2.1, 13.4, parts 3.5 and 5.1 of article 13.11, article 13.1 1.2, parts 2-11 of article 13.15 (in respect of administrative offences committed by the media), articles 13.15.1 (in respect of late submission of the media Information on the receipt of money provided for in the legislation of the Russian Federation on the mass media, broadcaster or publisher), part 1 13.21 (with regard to administrative offences committed by the media, excluding the production or distribution of media products, in the register No change in the composition of the co-founders), article 13.21 (in respect of administrative offences committed with the use of ses) Articles 13.22, 13.29, 13.29.4, 13.31, 13.34.13.40, 13.42 (in cases of violation of the system of communication) Technical means of countering threats to the sustainability, security and integrity of the information and telecommunications network on the territory of the Russian Federation and public communication networks and violations of the legal requirements for the operation of technical means of monitoring compliance with the requirements of the law on doc limitation Articles 13.42.1, 13.43.1, 13.44, parts 1 and 3 of article 13.45, parts 1 and 5 of article 13.54, parts 2.3 and 5 of article 14.3.1, parts 6 and 7 of article 19.7.10 of the present Code; Article 13.11, article 13.15.1 (in respect of the failure to provide information on receipt of money to the media, the broadcaster or the publisher for the provision of information on the receipt of funds by the media) by the Russian Federation on the mass media), article 13.21, part 1 (in respect of the manufacture or distribution of products of unregistered mass media), part of the 4 of article 13.29, parts 2 to 4 of article 13.31, articles 13.38, part 4 of article 14.1 (in respect of the gross violation of licensing requirements resulting from the failure of the communications operator to provide network and media requirements) 3.6. Cases of administrative offences, pre-trial detention, in the case provided for in paragraph 2 of part 1 of this article. Articles 8.5.1., 8.41 and 8.41.1 of the present Code may be initiated without monitoring (oversight) in cases where the material available or received by the authority carries out the activity. 3.7. Cases of administrative offences provided for in article 3 of the Convention shall be dealt with in accordance with the provisions of the Convention and shall be dealt with in accordance with the provisions of the Convention. Article 11.16, parts 2.3 and 4 of article 14.1, articles 19.20 and 20.4 of the present Code may be initiated by a federal State fire surveillance body without conducting checks (at the request of the competent authorities). in cases where, in materials, reports, reports, including fire-related offences and incidents, existing or received by a federal authority, 3.8. Cases of administrative offences provided for in part by the State shall contain sufficient data to indicate the existence of an administrative offence. Article 14.1, paragraphs 2 and 3, of article 19.20 of the present Code may be initiated without supervision (oversight) of licensees carrying out installation activities, Maintenance and repair of fire safety equipment for buildings and installations if sufficient evidence of an administrative offence exists, 3.9 The Administrative Offences Case, for its part, states that: A person authorized to draw up a record of such an administrative officer may, if he or she fails to comply with any of the mandatory requirements specified by the second part of the vazacate, be required to do so. if sufficient data are found to indicate the existence of the relevant administrative offence, if such data are obtained by control (oversight) activity without interaction with the person under control or with a special State control regime (oversight) — monitoring during which during the expedition In accordance with article 14 of the Russian Federation Act of 15 April 1993, N 4802-I on the status of the capital of the Russian Federation, technical and (or) software equipment with Photo and film functions, audio and video recording, detection, recognition, analysis and identification of objects, measurement of quantitative and qualitative indicators, including weighting, and g According to the Sabzac, the first part of an administrative offence can be brought in a city of federal importance in Moscow in the event of a non-consensual offence. of any of the mandatory requirements that are subject to regional State control (oversight) over the state, content, preservation, use, Promotion and State protection of cultural heritage, regional State building supervision, regional State environmental monitoring (oversight), regional State geological control (oversight), regional State control (oversight) for the protection and use of specially protected natural areas, regional state Monitoring (oversight) in road transport, urban land-based electric transport and the road sector, regional State housing control (oversight), regional on State control (oversight) of urban soil conservation and management, regional State control (oversight) of compliance with the requirements for the protection of green plantations In addition, the Ministry of the Interior, the Ministry of Transport, the Ministry of Transport, the Ministry of Transport, the Ministry of Transport, the Ministry of Transport, the Ministry of Transport, the Ministry of Transport, the Ministry of Transport, the Ministry of Transport, the Ministry of Transport, the Ministry of Transport, the Ministry of Transport, the Ministry of Transport, the Ministry of Transport, the Ministry of Transport, the Ministry of Transport, the Ministry of Transport, the Ministry of Transport, the Ministry of Transport, the Ministry of Transport, the Ministry of Transport, the Ministry of Transport, the Ministry of Transport, the Ministry of Transport, the Ministry of Transport, the Ministry of Transport and the Ministry of Transport, the Ministry of Transport, the Ministry of Transport, the Ministry of Transport, the Ministry of Transport and the Ministry of Transport, the Ministry of Transport, the Ministry of Transport, the Ministry of Transport, the Ministry of Transport, the Ministry of Transport and the Ministry of Transport, the Ministry of Transport, the Ministry of Transport, the Ministry of Transport, the Ministry of Transport and the Ministry of Transport, the Ministry of Transport, the Ministry of Transport, the Ministry of Transport and the Ministry of Transport of Transport and the Ministry of Transport of Transport of Transport of Transport of the 4. An administrative offence shall be deemed to have been initiated from the moment (1) the report of the inspection of the place where the administrative offence was committed is drawn up; (2) the preparation of a first instance Protocol on the Enforcement of Administrative Offences Proceedings, as provided for in articles 27.1 of the present Code; (3) Protocol on Administrative Law Enforcement :: Initiating or ordering the prosecutor to initiate administrative offences; (4) instituting administrative offences if necessary the administrative investigation provided for in article 28.7 of the present Code; (5) has ceased to be in force; (6) the ruling in the administrative offence case in the case of pre-trial detention Article 28.6 of the present Code, i.e. 1.3ily4; (7) making a determination on the demand for information in accordance with the happiness of article 26.10 of the present Code in the cases provided for in article 2, part 3 5. In the event of refusal to prosecute an administrative offence if there are materials, reports or statements referred to in paragraphs 2 and 3 of part 1 of this article, A reasoned decision is made by the person who has examined the material, communications, statements and a reasoned decision on the refusal to institute administrative proceedings. 1 and 3.2 of this article applies to cases of administrative offences involving non-compliance with the mandatory requirements for which the assessment is made. State control (oversight), municipal control, the organization and implementation of which are regulated by Federal Act No. 248-FZ of 31 July 2020 on State control (at the and municipal control in the Russian Federation» or Federal Act of 26 December 2008 No. 294-FZ on the protection of the rights of legal persons and individual entrepreneurs in the exercise of the State Acquainted control (oversight) and municipal control.»