Article 39: Extreme necessity

1. It is not a crime to harm the interests protected by criminal law in a state of extreme necessity, i.e. to eliminate a danger that directly threatens the person and rights of the person. A person or other persons protected by law in the interests of society or the State, unless the danger could be remedied by other means and the limits of the extreme neo were not exceeded. 2. An injury manifestly inconsistent with the nature and extent of the threat and the circumstances in which the danger of distress is recognized as exceeding the limits of extreme necessity. where the interests in question have been injured in an equal or more serious manner than those prevented, such an excess shall be criminally liable only in cases of intentional injury. And I’m hurt.