Article 181.4: Contestability of a decision of a meeting

1. The decision of the assembly may be declared null and void by the court if the requirements of the law are violated, including if: (1) there has been a fundamental breach of the procedure for deciding whether to proceed, The procedure for the preparation and holding of a general meeting or a vote in absentia of the members of the public, as well as for the decision-making of the general assembly, which affects the will of the participants in the assembly; (2) A person speaking on behalf of a member of the assembly did not have the authority; (3) there was a violation of the equality of rights of members of the civil society in holding a meeting of the general assembly. 4. There has been a fundamental violation of the rules on the drafting of the record, including the written form of the record (art. 181.2, para. 3). shall be declared null and void by the court on grounds of violation of the decision-making procedure if it is confirmed by a subsequent decision of the meeting taken in accordance with the established procedure prior to the issuance of the renminbi. 3. A decision of the Assembly may be challenged in court by a member of the relevant civil society who has not taken part in the proceedings or in the vote in absentia or who has voted against it. A member of the Assembly who has voted in favour of a decision or refrains from voting has the right to challenge the decision of the meeting in court in cases where he or she wishes to do so. 4. The decision of the meeting may not be declared null and void by the court if the vote of the person whose rights are affected by the contested decision has not affected its adoption. 5. The decision of the meeting may be challenged in court within six months of the date on which the person whose rights have been violated has not been respected. of the decision, learned or should have known about it, but not later than two years from the day the decision was made publicly available to the participants of the national concerned. 6. The person contesting the decision of the meeting shall notify in writing the members of the civil legal community concerned in advance of the intention to refer the matter to the competent authorities. The members of the relevant civil society who did not accede to the procedure established by the procedure by law, such an action, including other grounds for challenging the decision, is subsequently not entitled to apply to the court for challenge of the decision, if that is the case. 7. The contested decision of the assembly, declared null and void by the court, is null and void from the moment of its adoption.